This infographic may look pretty, but it packs a mean punch:
Wonderful narrative in watercolor – view it here.
Chateau Guiraud Sauternes
2001 BORDEAUX, FRANCE
On the nose, a supple sweetness, oaky whiskey barrels, expansive on the palate.
Ranges from apricots to mandarin oranges with overtones of orange blossom and honey.
Acidity provides structure that girths the sweetness – gleams on the finish.
Cellared 7 yrs.
Break this bottle out after a special occasion, or as I did with Thanksgiving leftovers.
- AHO
Alesia Pinot Noir
2004, SONOMA COAST, CA; KANZLER VINEYARD
Bright red fruit dance in complex spice and wallow in well-balanced acidity.
The nose and the finish showcase the lingering delicacy of a personal favorite, the west coast Pinot Noir.
Best if allowed to open.
An exquisite wine.
Drink now.
- AHO
Paringa Individual Vineyard Sparkling Shiraz
2004, SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Bubbles force dark cherry fruit forward. Nutmeg spice and citrus follow in a stealthy body. Finishes with silky tannins and a tart sweetness. Tastes are very focused upon opening, but it broadens pleasantly within 30 min. Well worth the wait for a special occasion (cellared 3 yrs – purchased at Binny’s 2007 Sparkling Tasting near Chicago).
Stored in naturally cooled area, approx. 58 degrees F in winter and up to 68 degrees F in summer.
- AHO
A new study out by the ITT Corporation ranks voters and businesses top infrastructure concerns – and the top issues in which voters/businesses want government to invest. The top 3?
Water, Electricity, Heat.
If these are the top services in which voters want government to invest, we can infer voters are willing to pay to see an improvement in these services. Considering the overwhelming likelihood that the next Congress will be defined by infighting, gridlock, and partisan antics and will result in very little legislative directives, what does this study indicate about our country?
People care about their resources! They want efficiency, they want reliability, they want (I would argue) a greater degree of security in how these services are delivered. The ITT Corporation study focuses on water infrastructure improvements (they are a water/wastewater systems provider), and you can read about their conclusions here. But for those of us who are not competing for lucrative government contracts, it is impossible to ignore what this implies for our built environments – homes, places of business, and such – energy, water, and heat are the areas where Americans want to invest upfront. This tells me it is not a far stretch to imagine the changes that would be welcomed within our building culture – increasing focus on minimizing a building’s water, electricity, and heating loads.
Low resource loads and low resource use in buildings can either be the product of expensive-but-technologically-advanced building components (super-insulated windows, efficient HVAC, geothermal heat, double envelope facades, efficient appliances, to name a few) or they can be the result of inexpensive, low-tech design solutions (orienting the building to maximize south exposure, properly shading the building, appropriate window to wall ratios based on climate, smaller building footprint, and so on).
I’d hope that any study showing an overwhelming majority of Americans overtly supporting investment in water, electricity, and heat infrastructure will come as a wake-up call to the big business building industry and the big monied interests that finance construction loans. We don’t need to wait for the government to throw money at infrastructure projects in order to improve how American’s use these services. We need a building culture that actually responds to the big issues of our day, not just one that repeats the same old pattern of development and building because it turned a profit in the past.
Does anyone really think that we can deliver a 21st century infrastructure when this is the majority of what gets built?
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid.
Frank Zappa
TED awarded $100,000 to photographer and street artist JR.
Of his work, the prize committee writes:
JR creates pervasive art that spreads uninvited on buildings of Parisian slums, on walls in the Middle East, on broken bridges in Africa or in favelas in Brazil. People in the exhibit communities, those who often live with the bare minimum, discover something absolutely unnecessary but utterly wonderful. And they don’t just see it, they make it. Elderly women become models for a day; kids turn into artists for a week. In this art scene, there is no stage to separate the actors from the spectators.
(or Why You Should Vote Republican)
As Republican-Independent-Libertarian-Constitution Party Oregon State Senate candidate Marilyn Kittelman emphatically declares, “The Choice Couldn’t Be More Clear”:
(emphasis mine)
That settles it for me, I’m voting against that burgling, raping, home invading, career politician Floyd Prozanski (or as some like to call him, that Democrat Floyd Prozanski).
I’m not actually, influenced politically by this mailer sent to my home on a Saturday afternoon. I’m kind of befuddled though. Doesn’t Marilyn’s campaign know the “tough on crime” meme is most effective when you give the criminals a name, a la Willie Horton?
A new way of visualizing how city road systems work uses only typeface. These maps are much more legible, despite how counter-intuitive the idea seems at first. See for yourself.
Ill-faded graffiti artist Banksy, who recently made his big screen debut with the art doc “Exit Through the Gift Shop“, will be hitting your television screens on the newest episode of The Simpsons. Don’t want to tune into FOX to watch this rare happening? Click here.











