Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Reddit button
Delicious button
Digg button
Flickr button
Stumbleupon button
Newsvine button

Posts tagged with facts

Emerging from the mist of a settled Health Care Reform, we’ve watched a movement get loud, angry, violent, and we’ve watched them get nothing done. I speak of the Tea Partiers, teabaggers and pseudo-populist rage-fomenters that comprise such groups as the Tea Party Patriots and Freedom Works. I speak of the same absurd minority protest group whose numbers are constantly dwarfed by immigration rallies, anti-war rallies and pro-health-reform rallies but whose media presence implies a greater significance than any other movement that exists, past or present.

At this point however, when the Tea Partier’s cause celebre – preventing America from obtaining democratic reforms to the health care system – has fallen flat on its face, it is hard to distract from the fact that these folks have no real influence on policy. I don’t know if this statement can be regarded as at all controversial though, considering that it is infinitely hard to infer the policy consequences of such rallying cries as “Say NO to Socialism” or “Keep Government Out of my Medicare”…

Never mind the glaring contradictions of such sentiments when one acknowledges that this movement is fueled by our bunk economy’s bad habit of bringing innocent, hard-working Americans down with it. It began with the bank bailouts, where the policy sell was tough regardless of the facts on the ground because when viewed in the abstract, who would honestly be in favor of the Federal government handing hundreds of billions of dollars over to corporate mega-banks? Obama had his work cut out for him in trying to sell that policy after the fact, especially when one considers the immediate recoil Republicans have at any fleeting mention of the consequences of George W. Bush’s 8 year debacle, but now that the taxpayer has recovered nearly all the money that was spent on the TARP bailouts of 2008, populism is in favor of the Obama administration.

Shortly after our country fully realized that we have a bona-fide Black President, we began to realize the political and legislative potency of that President with the passage of a historic economic stimulus package. The facts more than a year later reveal the positive impact of the stimulus, with hundreds of thousands of Americans put back to work, state governments helped to stay afloat, and tax cuts offered to 95% of Main St. America. Apparently this all threatened the egos of Republicans and Tea Partiers alike because nothing says I’m confident in the strength of my ideas like calling the opponent Hitler.

Then came Health Care Reform, the legislative priority that dominated the protest signs of teabaggers for the next year and will likely continue to exist at the forefront of anti-government activism in the year to come. All these agitations by the Obama Administration, these efforts to realign the priorities of the government from top to bottom, these audacious attempts to stave off the inevitable courses as set by the most powerful moneyed interests in the years prior, these actions incited the most virulent conservative activism in the last few decades.

The NYTimes profiles some connected figures in the Tea Party network, and the narrative that was sparked by cries against socialism and big government contrasting the ever present, supported, and oft-lauded role of government in these folks’ lives continues seamlessly. In my mind, one has no ground to stand upon to protest big government while accepting unemployment benefits, Medicare, Social Security or any of the other completely non-controversial, popular and necessary programs. This shallow margin by which Tea Party rhetoric has made its way into the halls of Congress is necessarily shallow. To delve deeper into the political discourse of the teabaggers, one must overlook the logical gaps of arguments that are created by the emotions of a populist reaction to economic uncertainty.

But that glaring hypocrisy is not a concern for much of the Tea Party movement. Principle and integrity of political arguments be damned, because these people are pissed! They are entitled to their government handouts, but fuck anyone else who tries to balance the scales. Fuck anyone else who has found themselves a victim of machinations larger than themselves. Fuck anyone whose woes lead them to vote for Democratic candidates or to support Democratic platforms. But to what avail is all this resentment being levied?

Rooting out government waste and spending taxpayer money more wisely is not some new idea that the Tea Party owns. Being against totalitarianism and facism isn’t new, but for christsake only the most paranoid and conspiratorial among us would actually buy into the notion that this Health Care Reform is even related to those despot regimens. Not trusting the notion of government is not an excuse for being completely and utterly irrational in one’s rhetoric. In fact, when such sentiments of paranoia and fear are allowed to prevail in political movements the result can be nothing but more paranoia and fear. As we’ve seen, the Tea Partiers and Republicans could not thwart the democratic will of the electorate or the administration to reform our health care system. But what have they done?

I can’t honestly answer that question. I can’t produce a single tangible result of this movement, beyond the ratings boost Fox News enjoyed by creating a fictional picture of America in revolt. The Tea Party movement really has no objectives beyond trying to elect Tea Party candidates and agitate for agitation’s sake. Does anyone really know what Tea Party candidates are for? What would a government run by Tea Partiers look like? Do Republicans really have to do much to convince the Tea Partiers that they are friendly? Would a Republican administration or a Republican congress just give in to the demands of this minute faction of the electorate simply because they are afraid of agitation from within?

I’m not trying to pose these questions or ruminate on this subject to salt the wounds created by Health Care reform becoming law, but because I think that any political movement needs to justify its existence in no uncertain terms. And they need to do it constantly. This isn’t a call for more delusional rhetoric to stir up the passions and prejudices of the tea-baggers, but a call for this movement to grow up and try to dispel the facts surrounding their inadequacy. I say this because I’m tired of the rigor that is applied to criticizing liberal politics and liberal movements not being applied to these Tea Partiers and the Republican/conservative ideologies that they push. This criticism is being levied not only at conservative outlets like Fox, but at similarly mainstream outlets like CNN and MSNBC who have dedicated countless hours of coverage to the Tea Party cohorts while unwaveringly ignoring other legitimate movements.

As a last aside, the Tea Parties are not doing themselves any favors by enlisting the inept former gov. Sarah Palin to be their poster child. Didn’t they get the memo that this person hurts things more than she helps things? Or maybe they really just want to ride the media coattails of a future reality TV star?

For anyone continuing to think that the Recovery Act (the stimulus) was a waste, think again.

These provide countenance to the fact that not only has our economy turned around, but that said turn-around occurred like clockwork with the Recovery Act becoming law. I was propelled to include these charts after criticism mounted over the supposed “bias-nature” of the graphic released by the White House that was created with the same data that created the above graphs. For a refresher, or for those who didn’t happen to see it, this is the White House’s graphic on job loss/the recession/the stimulus:

Beyond the obvious red/blue divide, nothing more partisan exists. One cannot simply claim the graph is partisan because it displays facts that support the arguments and views of a political party, especially not when these facts are indeed true. Add to the overall objectivity of the White House’s release of stimulus-related and economic data these charts on real GDP and Payroll Job Losses and you can see that there isn’t much room to claim on principle that the stimulus failed. (Both come from a Feb 17th report on the 1 year progress of the stimulus issued by VP Joe Biden).

This is just one example of Beck’s paltry skill. For many more examples of his obliquely crass, chalk-board aided diatribes, see here.

Considering the incomprehensible nature of all these charts Beck draws, I continue to wonder why anyone lets him waste air-time and money to continue to feature said charts. More confoundedly though, I continue to wonder exactly how Beck thinks that these charts help him make an argument.

I like to feature examples of illustrations, charts, diagrams that communicate information particularly well; however, we should consider this as a study in contrasts. It pains me though to realize that these ridiculously poor-quality, partisan and propagandist diagrams continue to receive more validation and exposure than many of the more credible, factual ones out there. Its like the Republicans lame attempt at satire when they created that diagram of the health care legislation – do they really think this is helping their cause, to exhibit exactly how they’ve been spending their time and effort, making charts that communicate nothing while distorting the facts that were used to create said chart?

Well, I guess I answered my own question – of course distorting the facts surrounding health care helps Republicans!

0 comments

7:00 PM

Why we need a Big Bank Tax

From the most happening, data-tracking, investigating journalists on the web, ProPublica brings us some perspective on the bailout.

Note the incredible disparity between outflow of bailout money and revenues returned. And for any folks (those in Congress/media in particular) who lament the bailout or consider the national debt a burden on future generations : you must be taking something under the table if you oppose a fee on the same giant banking establishments that our concurrently turning out record profits/bonuses while acting as a vacuum for taxpayer money. THEY OWE US NOW, not the other way around.

0 comments

8:03 AM

Snow fuels debate?

News is that the east coast, which includes Washington DC, which is where our national politicians live, is getting some snow. Oh wait, scratch that, not really news, because it is February. Despite that little fact of life (winter tends to mean snow, sometimes lots of it), the NYTimes decided to run an article in their Science/Environment section titled, “Climate-change debate is heating up in deep freeze,”. This article basically provides an outlet for all the shenanigans pulled by climate-change skeptics who like to take advantage of the average American’s shaky grasp on science, with seemingly anecdotal rebuttals by “scientists” provided as the factual context to this debate (which is heating up, but wait it’s cold outside – leave it to the NYTimes to spend more time coming up with a witty headline than writing a worth-while article).

Sorry, but it isn’t debate that is heating up. It is opportunism. The Republicans pulling these stunts, like building an igloo and declaring it “Mr. Gore’s new home”, don’t care what the factual basis for climate change is. They care that they have an opportunity to reinforce the conclusion that they and their constituents have already come to, science be damned. Rachel Maddow covered this last night, eviscerating those climate-change deniers with the help of Bill Nye, but she did so in an entirely appropriate way – by condescendingly mocking the shallow logic that these Republicans are subscribing to. But the NY Times has decided that all this agitation on the right, completely devoid of evidence-based arguments to buffer their case, constitutes debate.

If you want to know what is wrong with Washington, look no further than what constitutes debate in the media. I had more conclusive, heated debates in high school.

0 comments

12:21 AM

Ridin that Train (con’t)

A subdued, but fresh comparison of the nation’s largest public transit systems from our friends at GOOD. From left to right New York City Transit (NYCT), Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), and Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA):

What should come next is a comparison based not upon raw size of the public transit system, but of the relative size. These numbers have a slightly misleading character to them, in that the amount of people and area of land that the system covers is only hinted at in the “miles per trip (avg)” metric.

Take Portland, for example. They boast quite an impressive public transit system that serves an ever-expanding suburban periphery and provides it service for free within the city’s downtown. As well, Portland and its surrounding areas are the subject of a reinvigorated movement (well, semi-new) in development known as Transit-Oriented-Development (TOD). The goal is to fully integrate every new development (and further integrate existing ones) to the larger Portland area through the public transit system, resulting in suburban communities that are more walkable and a larger metropolitan area that is truly the sum of its parts.

For more on TOD and ongoing research check out the Sustainable Cities Initiative.

0 comments

9:28 PM

Quite the Graph

An interactive, educational, information-packed, 3 color graph that includes a short slideshow and annotations (it is a lot more interesting than I’ve described it here).

Occasionally I’ll be very drawn into a graph or diagram, and when it happens I always feel like I’ve learned so much after thoroughly digesting it. The shear inaccuracy of many of those predictions is amazing, the majority of budgets and forecasts were completely wrong. A couple of relatively accurate periods though : 84 – 85 forecasts resembled reality largely through 87; 03 – 04 forecasts correctly predicted the deficit in 06. That isn’t a great track record. It is almost comical at times to see just how wrong some predictions were. Standing out the most to me are 01 and 02 – seems like they were almost trying to will the surplus to stick around, projecting positive thoughts. That kind of fits with those folks though, they liked to project.